Practical guides
Step-by-step workflows, reusable briefs, and agent guardrails
Prepare a Verifiable Submission Package for AgriHackathon or Course Defense
Judges look for a real problem, a working demo, clear team roles, and process evidence; prepare screenshots, links, and a backup plan before the deadline.
From the features we have actually implemented, draft a competition submission summary: 1) problem and target users; 2) the 3 live demo steps; 3) verified data or test results; 4) teammate roles; 5) work planned for after the event. Do not overstate unshipped capabilities.
Contest time is short. One working path with real sample input, visible processing, and verifiable output beats ten decorative buttons that do nothing.
What to keepOne primary demo path runs from input to output.
Live Wi-Fi or external APIs can fail during judging. Alongside your live URL, prepare 3 to 5 key state screenshots, a short screen recording, and each teammate's role.
- Smoke-test the primary flow in a fresh window
- Prepare offline screenshots or a short recording as a live-network fallback
- State honestly which parts are implemented now versus planned next
What to keepThe live link, screenshots, screen recording, and roles sit in one place.
In the final two hours, avoid sweeping style refactors or schema changes. Verify that your submission form, attachment links, team roster, and public showcase card match.
What to keepThe submission note separates shipped features from post-event plans.